Unfortunately these horror stories are wayyyy too common, and
ironically I had a similiar experience with a representative from
Gatineau, Quebec. My complaint with CSIC was that I paid the rep $1800
(plus the processing fees, security check fees, medical fees, AND
shipping costs to the processing centre), and he took 2 months to
"prepare" the application, but his version of a "prepared" application
was sticking it in a 97 cent paper folder with plastic protectors, and
writing a cover letter. He kept asking me for the same information over
and over again to the point that I had to complete the forms myself and
give them to him to get everything done. Unfortunately, moral of my
story is that I wasn't fully aware that by submitting an application
inland there is NO right of appeal, and we didn't want to take that
chance, so we're in the processing of withdrawing the already in
process application at Vegreville, so that we can apply to Mississauga
and have it processed outside Canada. Already we've lost 4 months and
several thousands for hardly any work whatsoever.
Moral of my story: Stick with CSIC's complaint department. When I felt
that I was being taken advantage of I submitting a 3-page letter to
CSIC (as well as their required complaint forms) explaining my ENTIRE
experience with the consultant, and also the reasons that I've
justified he hasn't complied with their Rules of Conduct. CSIC members
are required to carry certain liability insurance, so if you file a
complaint, this may be one of the options to settlement. Usually CSIC
likes to first take the role of a medium entity, and coordinate a
closure to the complaint between the consultant and the applicant. If
this can't be accomplished, then of course they have other resources.
My entire complaint to CSIC was around 10 pages in length since I
included all the errors in application that the consultant made (mind
you I had to correct all of them before I mailed it to Vegreville...the
consultant didn't proof-read anything), as well as payment receipts
made to the consultant.
CSIC states that they can't take responsibility for complaints that
believe they were charged too much money by the consultant, however
they will investigate complaints where proper services were not
rendered.
Ironically CSIC's membership critera requires that you either have 1
year of full-time experience, 10 cases that have been processed through
CIC, or complete an accredited immigration certification program. This
means that if they aren't a member of CSIC yet, then they probably are
gaining the necessary experience to become one. If you notice CIC's
site, it's very clear...they must be a member of CSIC to REPRESENT YOU
before CIC or an Appeals Board. That doesn't mean they have to be a
member to prepare an application and file it for you. You are at your
own risk when you hire someone that isn't a member of CSIC.
Please let me know if you have filed another application, as you have
waited over 3years for your wife's immigration, it's safe to say that
if the application had been filed in the first place correctly, your
wife would be a permanent resident by now.
Steve
wrote:[uq]
> Hi,
> I was wondering if one here was con by Lisa Macdonald of Macdonald &
> Accoiates (www.canadavisaonline.com). Below is my story:
>
> We have following complains about Lisa Macdonald.
>
> 1. Withholding the immigration fees without prior notification.
> 2. Providing us wrongful information about our case
> 3. Misrepresenting our case
> 4. Harassing us
> 5. Causing us unnecessary stress and emotional
>
> And we would like to receive the full refund of our money
> Fund Paid Amount
> Initial Payment made to the Firm $ 797 USD
> Application Processing Fees $ 475 CAN
> Sponsor's Processing Fees $ 75 CAN
> Landing Fees $ 975 CAN
>
> >From this point Lisa Macdonald would be referred as She and Drew Quantz
> as He.
>
> We hired Lisa Macdonald to file my wife's immigration case (spousal
> sponsorship) back in October 2002. Every thing was going OK till
> January 2003, when I asked her to provide me some sort of proof that my
> wife's application is filed. She refused to provide me the proof
> instead she stated that she mail IMM5401 (immigration payment receipt)
> to immigration by mistake and I should wait at least a 60 day to
> receive LOA (Letter of Authorization) and referred me to Drew Quantz.
>
> In March 2003 I even went to Montreal, to meet Lisa Macdonald. Upon
> arrival in Montreal Drew Quantz met me and told me that Lisa is on
> vacation. He demanded me to give him rest of the payment before he can
> give me some sort of proof that my wife's application has been filed.
> During our meeting when Drew showed me the paper work nothing was done
> to it, even the FBI fingerprints were sent. I refused to pay Drew the
> second payment of their fee and told them he needs to find the status
> of my wife's file instead he refilled my wife's case with incorrect
> fee. A month later my wife and I called immigration to check the
> status of my wife's application and was told by immigration that our
> application has been returned. Two weeks later Drew called us and said
> he has received the receipt from immigration and demanded rest of the
> payment. I refused to pay him the second payment because he had not
> filed my case back in January 2003 and application, which was filled in
> March 2003, was also returned by immigration. Since nothing was done
> to my wife's application I demanded Drew and Lisa refund my money
> specially Processing and Land Fee, which they refused.
>
> Since that day my wife and I have taken following steps.
>