Re: Spouse points
(JAJ) wrote in message news:<>...
> >On 19 Nov 2003 17:15:21 -0800, (JFK) wrote:
> >My wife and I are in the very early stages of applying for emigration
> >to Australia. I intend to apply under the skilled independant
> >category and would be sponsored by my sister who is an Australian
> >citizen currently residing in Malaysia.
>
> You must mean skilled sponsored rather than skilled independent.
>
> If your Australian citizen sponsor is living overseas, there may be
> issues both with acceptability of the sponsorship to DIMIA, and you
> will certainly need an assurer who meets the income and requirements
> for the mandatory assurance of support.
>
> You should get some professional advice on this.
>
>
> > I have worked out that my
> >points total without my wife's spouse skills points would be 110 which
> >I believe meets the required total for the Skilled - Australian
> >Sponsored category.
> >
> >Could anyone advise me on the following questions:
> >
> >1. Would it be advisable for me to apply for the extra points
> >available for my wife's spouse skills even though in theory I may not
> >require them?
>
> Probably yes, because it gives you some protection against having been
> over-optimistic in assessing your points.
>
>
> >
> >2. If I did apply using the extra points available for my wifes spouse
> >skills would this mean that if my skills and/or experience was not
> >deemed to be suitable by DIMA for emigration purposes, then my wifes
> >skills and experience would automatically be considered as if she was
> >the main applicant instead thereby giving us a better chance of
> >success?
> >
> >If anyone can help with this I would be most grateful.
>
> Your wife must be the main applicant if it's her relative.
>
> Both of you will be assessed for the points test (with each partner
> contributing the spouse skills if applicable) and the case officer
> will take the higher result.
>
> Note that this process does not apply to skilled independent, where
> the main applicant must be the skilled partner.
>
> But your main problems may be acceptability of the sponsorship and
> assurance - get some good advice from a professional.
>
> Jeremy
> This is not intended to be legal advice in any jurisdiction
Thanks Jeremy, I will find out more about the Family sponsor and
Assurance of support issues.
regards
John
|