Originally posted by krissyv
> The law in NZ is that its a gift & as such the ring doesn't have to be
> returned.
>
Setting aside all the freaky deaky aspects of this situation, I hate to
be the one to bring this to your attention but in many states in the
US, any gift in contemplation of marriage, including an engagement
ring, is a conditional gift subject to return at the election of the
giver if the contract is not performed. In order to know what law
you'd be subject to, you'd need to look at the law at the state in
which your ex fiance resides.
Then you get to have some choice of law fun, because of course you're
correct in pointing out that the situs of the contract governs the
applicable law, so the question becomes whether the ring is governed by
New Zealand or whichever state's law.
Personally....I'd make him sue you in New Zealand, just because I'm evil
like that. But of course, personal service rules being what they are,
he can in theory obtain jurisdiction in a US court over you simply by
effectuating international service (assuming he can figure out how to do
that, and I assume you aren't going to tell him). If that occurs, you'd
have to at a minimum have someone make an appearance for a change of
venue and there are all sorts of conventions governing that.....
What fun.
Sorry your ex-fiance is a heel. Good luck sorting things.
P.S. I just realized your fiance is in California. The statute
that governs is Civil Code 1590, and it requires return of the
ring unless there is a court finding that you don't have to
give it back:
"Where either party to a contemplated marriage in this State makes a
gift of money or property to the other on the basis or assumption that
the marriage will take place, in the event that the donee refuses to
enter into the marriage as contemplated or that it is given up by mutual
consent, the donor may recover such gift or such part of its value as
may, under all of the circumstances of the case, be found by a court or
jury to be just".