Casey

http://www.whitehouse.org/initiatives/posters/

Attn: non-Americans, the poster in the top row on the right
features Ann Coulter, a particularly insufferable Republican
who wishes that Senator Joe McCarthy would rise from the
dead and resume his old habits.


Casey

David Horne

Casey <> wrote:

    > http://www.whitehouse.org/initiatives/posters/
    >
    > Attn: non-Americans, the poster in the top row on the right
    > features Ann Coulter, a particularly insufferable Republican
    > who wishes that Senator Joe McCarthy would rise from the
    > dead and resume his old habits.

The whole website is a hoot- surprising (but cause for optimism!) that
they get away with it really!

David

Keith Anderson

On Tue, 14 Oct 2003 14:06:50 GMT, "Casey" <> wrote:

    >http://www.whitehouse.org/initiatives/posters/
    >Attn: non-Americans, the poster in the top row on the right
    >features Ann Coulter, a particularly insufferable Republican
    >who wishes that Senator Joe McCarthy would rise from the
    >dead and resume his old habits.

Great stuff - even one of our little shit Blair - or Bliar as he is
now sometimes referred to.

Here's another to snigger at:

http://www.snitchreport.com/spotting/index.html

Johnt

"Casey" <> wrote in message
news:_pTib.582$...
    > http://www.whitehouse.org/initiatives/posters/
    > Attn: non-Americans, the poster in the top row on the right
    > features Ann Coulter, a particularly insufferable Republican
    > who wishes that Senator Joe McCarthy would rise from the
    > dead and resume his old habits.
    > Casey

1. There isn't a poster top tight.

2. The whole thing is infantile.

3. What relevance does it have to this ng?

JohnT

Casey

    > > Attn: non-Americans, the poster in the top row on the right
    > > features Ann Coulter, a particularly insufferable Republican
    > > who wishes that Senator Joe McCarthy would rise from the
    > > dead and resume his old habits.
    > 1. There isn't a poster top tight.

My post was written as "top row on the right", not top tight. Even
if you were referring to the fact that the top row only contains two
entries, my reference to the right is still valid, as top middle would
be incorrect given that there is no entry to its right.

    > 2. The whole thing is infantile.

Considering your lack of reading comprehension skills and misuse
of basic logic, it is understandable that you missed the point.

    > 3. What relevance does it have to this ng?

For those of us with human intelligence, OT stands for Off Topic,
the generally accepted way to indicate that a post is not pertinent.

Go back to watching Jerry Springer, as the Internet is obviously
too complex for you.


Casey

Desmond Coughlan

le Tue, 14 Oct 2003 14:06:50 GMT, dans l'article <_pTib.582$>, Casey <> a dit ...

    > http://www.whitehouse.org/initiatives/posters/

I _love_ the one of Tony Blair. 'Fancy a snort of Yank bum ? It's
bloody good !!'

Almost fell off my seat ...

Johnt

"Casey" <> wrote in message
news:LwVib.995$...
    > > > Attn: non-Americans, the poster in the top row on the right
    > > > features Ann Coulter, a particularly insufferable Republican
    > > > who wishes that Senator Joe McCarthy would rise from the
    > > > dead and resume his old habits.
    > >
    > > 1. There isn't a poster top tight.
    > My post was written as "top row on the right", not top tight. Even
    > if you were referring to the fact that the top row only contains two
    > entries, my reference to the right is still valid, as top middle would
    > be incorrect given that there is no entry to its right.
    > > 2. The whole thing is infantile.
    > Considering your lack of reading comprehension skills and misuse
    > of basic logic, it is understandable that you missed the point.
    > > 3. What relevance does it have to this ng?
    > For those of us with human intelligence, OT stands for Off Topic,
    > the generally accepted way to indicate that a post is not pertinent.
    > Go back to watching Jerry Springer, as the Internet is obviously
    > too complex for you.
    > Casey
Who is Jerry Springer?

JohnT

Lynn Guinni

JohnT wrote:

    > > > 3. What relevance does it have to this ng?
    > >
    > > For those of us with human intelligence, OT stands for Off Topic,
    > > the generally accepted way to indicate that a post is not pertinent.
    > >
    > > Go back to watching Jerry Springer, as the Internet is obviously
    > > too complex for you.

Why is it that the person who would like to see ngs stay on topic is fit
only to watch junk TV, but someone who vandalizes the ng with OT clutter
thinks he is the one with "human intelligence"?

Hatunen

On Tue, 14 Oct 2003 14:06:50 GMT, "Casey" <>
wrote:

    >http://www.whitehouse.org/initiatives/posters/
    >Attn: non-Americans, the poster in the top row on the right
    >features Ann Coulter, a particularly insufferable Republican
    >who wishes that Senator Joe McCarthy would rise from the
    >dead and resume his old habits.

You mean boozing?

************* DAVE HATUNEN () *************
* Tucson Arizona, out where the cacti grow *
* My typos & mispellings are intentional copyright traps *

Icono Clast

(David Horne) wrote:
    > The whole website is a hoot- surprising (but cause for optimism!) that
    > they get away with it really!

Ahem, David. In this country the Constitution is written. We have a
RIGHT to get away with it. I doubt that it surprises any of us.

Yes, you have the same right but it isn't written.

I have ICQ conversations with people in other countries who were
afraid to answer some of my questions or discuss certain subjects.
Frightening.

Very old joke:
In the USA, we have the right to criticize our President.
So do we. In the Soviet Union we have the right to criticize your
President.
__________________________________________________ __________
A San Franciscan in (where else?) San Francisco
http://geocities.com/dancefest/ http://geocities.com/iconoc/
ICQ: http://wwp.mirabilis.com/19098103 IClast at SFbay Net