Dean Bullock

I'am an anglo american and my son is half mexican and half anglo and PROUD
OF HIM. I agree, there are certain illegals who display such undesireable
behavior, but that happens everywhere, no matter the race in this crazy
world, but did you think the native indian here, accepted the white anglo in
this country? So my question to you, is........who are you to judge others?
You and I do not belong here either, besides the mexican was here before the
united states annexed the western half of this country

Dean Bullock

why yo disin the meeeexicam? COC

--=Cochise~|||~Guardian=--

On Thu, 11 Dec 2003 20:26:15 -0500, "Dean Bullock" <> opined:

    >This country was built by immigrants whatever the status

Immigrants didn't build this country. Americans did, imbecile.

If my family has been here for six generations, and they all had jobs, how
can it be said that America was built by immigrants. If my case is typical,
only 1/6 of America has been built by immigrants.

Now, if having been built by an immigrant means that for the rest of
eternity anyone calling himself an immigrant has carte blanche, then I say
we settle the problem once and for all. We should turn over 1/6 of the U.S.
land mass, declare it as having been "built by immigrants", open its borders
and let everybody in the world move there.

Alaska would fit the bill nicely. We might even be able to trick Russia into
buying it back first.

Immigration averaged only 235,000 persons per year prior to the disastrous
1965 Immigration Act. That's only 47 million immigrants over the course of
our nation's history. Compared to our current population of 270 million,
that's not much. And then, if we add all the people who have lived before in
the United States, we are approaching a billion total Americans who live now
or have lived in this country--all of them, or at least most of them, busy
"building" it.
-----------------------
\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
California Proposition 187 - You Loved It - Most Voted For It
It's Baaaaack!!! http://www.tinyurl.com/xl5d
No Public Services for the Invading Hordes
PETITIONS NOW READY FOR DOWNLOADING
See: http://www.save187.com
////////////////////////

Supernav

    >This country was built by immigrants whatever the status



Yes immigrants. NOT ILLEGALS.



None of us are anti-immigrants. We're against people who BREAK LAWS.
The illegals.



Why people keep lumping immigrants and illegals togheter I don't know.



One side obeys laws, the other side doesn't. They're not even close to
being the same.



-= nav =-

Dean Bullock

CMON CHIEF, WHO IN THE HELL DO YOU THINK AMERICANS
ARE..............................WE ARE ALL DERIVED FROM AN IMMIGRANT ONE
WAY OR ANOTHER................CHECK ANCESTRY.COM...........DOOFUS

Dean Bullock

ITS PEOPLE THAT THINK RIGHTOUSLY LIKE ME THAT KEEP PEOPLE THAT THINK LIKE
YOU, IN CHECK.....................MATE OR OTHERWISE WE WILL ALL SUFFER FROM
YOUR RACISM AND IDEALISTIC VIEWS

Dean Bullock

Well werent we considered in an native- indian sense that we were in a-way
illegals, instead of infiltrating this land peaceably, we invaded and took
it by FORCE. So what is worse? Illegals coming here to escape some forms of
corruption in their country to pave a better way of life for them and their
families? Or for us to invade and conquer the native, oppressing them, and
displacing them on.............................RESERVATIONS? WHO MADE US
JUDGE, JURY AND.................EXECUTIONER?


WEEEELL...........................WHATS IT GONNA BE?

Anonymous

"Dean Bullock" <> wrote in message
news:brb5g0$4s0n$...
    > This country was built by immigrants whatever the status
Do you let the people who built your house live with you whenever they want
to?

Supernav

    >Are you also against those taxpaying US citizens who hire

    >illegals to work



Yes.



    >They came by force etc.



Society then is DIFFERENT then it was now. Back then, there were no
immigration laws. Now we have a democracy of people who have voted all
together to create and have ENFORCED immigration LAWS.



Stop using that as a stupid stupid scapegoat. People back then had a
RIGHT o immigrate because there were no Native American INS inspectors
at POE's. How they TREATED Native Americans when they got here, is a
whole different issue. Learn to seperate THE TWO.



Either way -- if you're gonna break the law -- stop using stupid
terminology that has nothing to do with your situation. You're still a
lawbreaker.



-= nav =-

H. Reader

"Ken Pisichko" <> wrote in message
news:...
    > If you want to play THAT game,

I'm inclined to play the game of factual accuracy. How about you?

    > look at human "conquest" of any land.

Okay. I'm looking at it. I presume, too hopefully and too
charitably, probably, that you have a point.

    > Some day
    > Nebraska and Texas and even New York will be held by a "nation" other than
the
    > USA.

Not without a heck of a fight.

    > Same goes for the other 49 states and for that Bay held by the US military
    > in Cuba, etc.... Nothing lasts forever.

Thanks for the penetrating observation. Did you come up with
the epigram too?

    > Read the poem "Ozymandeous of Egypt"
    > that is in some high school reading requirements. Same old story :-(

But guess what. The Mexicans never *owned* much of anything
outside of what is today's Mexico.

    > No point in making fun of some other group of people because they don't
meet
    > your (i.e. the ridiculer's) standards.

Really? Why not? Whose standards should I use as the impetus
of ridicule, other than my own?

    > Differences is what makes this world so
    > rich.

Oh my ... Another we-are-the-world airhead repeats the
tedious mantra. The people of the Balkans, of Indonesia,
of the former Soviet Union, and of numerous other places
around the world have differences. Do those differences
make them "rich?"

    > Is that not one of the reasons why the USA wanted immigration so many
    > years ago

No. The Robber Barons of the late 19th Century wanted
cheap foreign labor, a trait they share with today's
robber barons.

    >(aka "Give us your unwanted....... (people) ....."?

You don't know what you're talking about, do you.


    > "H. Reader" wrote:
    > > "--=Cochise~|||~Guardian=--" <jay*--REMOVE--*@adnmail.com> wrote in
message
    > > news:...
    > > > On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 22:23:13 -0600, Ken Pisichko <>
opined:
    > > >
    > > > >--=Cochise~|||~Guardian=-- wrote:
    > > > >
    > > > >>
    > > > >> The Mexican was too weak to hold onto anything significant, and is
    > > still to stupid or too corrupt to create a
    > > > >> decent society. The only good Mexican is either "en México," or "en
    > > carcerated." Of course there's one other
    > > > >> sort of "good Mexican", and that's "en terra," if you get my drift
    :-D
    > > > >>
    > > > >
    > > > >Sounds like the rationale used by other nations in colonizing a free
    > > peoples and putting them into colonial
    > > > >"slavery". Materialistic Bullies talk that talk. What is wrong with
    > > someone holding on to what is "theirs" -
    > > > >unless a bully covets it?
    > > >
    > > > Kindly provide proof that the lowly Mexican held the territory in
question
    > > for more than about 25 years after
    > > > stealing said territory from Spain.
    > >
    > > The lowly Mexicans never did hold the territory; the Apaches and
    > > Comanches did.