The Grammer Genious

Tom wrote:

    > Can I marry my dog?

This is EXACTLY the kind of things people said when it was proposed that whites
and blacks could marry. And it's the same ugly thing.

Tom

Now that homos can marry each other and marriage no longer means union
between a man and a woman I was thinking, I really love my dog, he
loves me, we've been together for 5 years (long term commited
relationship) and we plan on spending the rest of our lives together.
Can I marry my dog?

Also, my neighbor has a Burmese python that he feels the same way
about. Can they get married?

Also, one of the guys at work wants to know if he can marry his 6 year
old daughter.

By the way, I signed a 30 year mortgage when I bought my house. Can
we be considered married?

Robert

You are so stupid.

Let's argue with your strawman.

No, you can't marry your dog. Your dog cannot consent as an adult. It does
not have the mental capacity to consent.

Your neighbor's python does not have the mental capacity to consent.

Your co-workers six year old does not have the mental capcacity to consent.

And you don't have the mental capacity to intelligently argue this.


"Tom" <> wrote in message
news:oo2o30prf6k9mo4a9ithj80lfripino5dm@news...
    > Now that homos can marry each other and marriage no longer means union
    > between a man and a woman I was thinking, I really love my dog, he
    > loves me, we've been together for 5 years (long term commited
    > relationship) and we plan on spending the rest of our lives together.
    > Can I marry my dog?
    > Also, my neighbor has a Burmese python that he feels the same way
    > about. Can they get married?
    > Also, one of the guys at work wants to know if he can marry his 6 year
    > old daughter.
    > By the way, I signed a 30 year mortgage when I bought my house. Can
    > we be considered married?

Julian D .

On Tue, 24 Feb 2004 20:47:18 -0500, The Grammer Genious
<> wrote:

    >Tom wrote:
    >> Can I marry my dog?
    >This is EXACTLY the kind of things people said when it was proposed that whites
    >and blacks could marry. And it's the same ugly thing.


What if 3 men want to marry each other?
Where does it end?


JD


"Some have said we must not act until the threat is imminent. Since when have terrorists and
tyrants announced their intentions, politely putting us on notice before they strike?
If this threat is permitted to fully and suddenly emerge, all actions, all words and all recriminations
would come too late."
-President George W. Bush
January 28, 2003
(Another liberal lie exposed.)

"This time, I think the Americans are serious.
Bush is not Clinton. I think this is the end."
-Uday Hussein

"There's no question that Saddam Hussein is a threat to the United States
and to our allies."
Former Vermont Governor Howard Dean
Face the Nation
September 2002

Dennis Kemmerer

"The Grammer Genious" <> wrote in message
news:403c0cfb$0$3099$...
    > Tom wrote:
    > > Can I marry my dog?
    > This is EXACTLY the kind of things people said when it was proposed that
whites
    > and blacks could marry. And it's the same ugly thing.

From the same idiots that skipped the same civics classes.

Hey, Tom, look up 'informed consent.'

Dennis Kemmerer

"Julian D." <> wrote in message
news:...
    > On Tue, 24 Feb 2004 20:47:18 -0500, The Grammer Genious
    > <> wrote:
    > >Tom wrote:
    > >
    > >> Can I marry my dog?
    > >
    > >This is EXACTLY the kind of things people said when it was proposed that
whites
    > >and blacks could marry. And it's the same ugly thing.
    > What if 3 men want to marry each other?
    > Where does it end?

Look up 'slippery slope.'

Get some new material.

[snip]

David.Callyar

Julian D. wrote:

    > On Tue, 24 Feb 2004 20:47:18 -0500, The Grammer Genious
    > <> wrote:
    > >Tom wrote:
    > >
    > >> Can I marry my dog?
    > >
    > >This is EXACTLY the kind of things people said when it was proposed that whites
    > >and blacks could marry. And it's the same ugly thing.
    > What if 3 men want to marry each other?
    > Where does it end?

Whine that to Scalia.

In his dissent, Justice Scalia takes care to distance himself from
one of the cases he relies upon, a century-old decision upholding
an anti-polygamy statute on the grounds that the statute was
"wholesome and necessary in the founding of a free, self-governing
commonwealth, fit to take rank as one of the co-ordinate States
of the Union." Justice Scalia quotes the decision but adds a
disclaimer: "I would not myself indulge in such official praise for
heterosexual monogamy, because I think it no business of the
courts (as opposed to the political branches) to take sides in
this culture war."

Buckaroo Banzai

"Robert" <> wrote in message
news:N0U_b.27793$%...
    > You are so stupid.
    > Let's argue with your strawman.
    > No, you can't marry your dog. Your dog cannot consent as an adult. It
does
    > not have the mental capacity to consent.
    > Your neighbor's python does not have the mental capacity to consent.
    > Your co-workers six year old does not have the mental capcacity to
consent.
    > And you don't have the mental capacity to intelligently argue this.

So retards *can't* marry?

:::: Jewitch :::::

I wish I thought of this poster's name.

Light Templar

"Buckaroo Banzai" <> wrote in message
news:ozU_b.19233$...
    > "Robert" <> wrote in message
    > news:N0U_b.27793$%...
    > > You are so stupid.
    > >
    > > Let's argue with your strawman.
    > >
    > > No, you can't marry your dog. Your dog cannot consent as an adult. It
    > does
    > > not have the mental capacity to consent.
    > >
    > > Your neighbor's python does not have the mental capacity to consent.
    > >
    > > Your co-workers six year old does not have the mental capcacity to
    > consent.
    > >
    > > And you don't have the mental capacity to intelligently argue this.
    > So retards *can't* marry?

It depends on the state, but in most states, a lower level IQ is set and
below that people are not allowed to give "informed consent" without either
state approval, or parent/guardian approval, and/or court approval. It
depends on the state and the system they have in place. Here in Michigan,
I believe that an IQ of 45 and below is the standard used.