INS, when it still exisited, has pretty unequivocally decided - albeit in
a slightly different context - that drunk driving is not a crime of moral
turpitude.
The context was related to deportations, rather than to admissibility, but
the conclusion should be transferrable. Just as important for you, the
cases in question were *multiple* drunk driving convictions where the
person actually did go to jail. Still, it was no crime of moral turpitude.
On Mon, 24 Nov 2003 00:02:59 +0000, Dave wrote:
> Bit confusing what contitues moral turpitude
>
> The I-94 has the box to tick about this and some folks have mentioned a
> drink driving charge with only month suspension will require me to tick
> the box.
>
> There is a faq somewhere that states that drink driving charge does not
> preclude me form the VWP, however I have to have court record to prove
> no I did not go to jail/gaol
>
> however looking at the following which is from INA: ACT 212 - GENERAL
> CLASSES OF ALIENS INELIGIBLE TO RECEIVE VISAS AND INELIGIBLE FOR
> ADMISSION; WAIVERS OF INADMISSIBILLITY
>
> The exception clause at the end in section (ii) (II) assumes I tick no.
> Any comments?
>
__________________
Remember, I am strictly a layperson without any legal training. I encourage
everybody to seek competent legal counsel rather than relying on usenet
newsgroups.
Please support H.R. 539, H.R. 832 and S. 1510. More information at
http://www.kkeane.com/lobbyspousal-faq.shtml
Please visit my new FAQ at
http://www.kkeane.com (always under construction)
My email address in usenet posts is now invalid for spam protection. See
my Web site for information on how to contact me.
Please feel free to enjoy some of my photographs at my Web site
http://www.ingopakleppa.com ! Comments are welcome.