expatforums
Go Back   expatforums > Immigration & Visas > Australia & New Zealand Immigration > Eastern Europe, what's in a name?
Australia & New Zealand Immigration Immigration to Australia and New Zealand - This is a gateway to the misc.immigration.australia+nz newsgroup.

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 11-17-2006, 12:56 PM   #1 (permalink)
Aivo Liiv03
 
Posts: 1
Default Eastern Europe, what's in a name?

http://groups.msn.com/BalticLoyalist/

Eastern Europe, what's in a name?

By Wolf Fenrir, 27 October 2006

"Eastern Europe." "East Europeans..." We are bombarded with these
word-combinations by the elite-controlled media. Most of the media
stories are unflattering: people traffickers, massage-parlours,
sex-shops, mafia, job-thieves, crooks; they depress wage market; push
up rental prises; speak in tongues; are swamping the country. A
torrent of racist abuse is unleashed, when it is no secret that most
East Europeans have no intention of staying in the UK. According to a
published research 99% of Poles who consider going to Britain claimed
they do not wish to stay there permanently. And that's before they
have taken a bus through Tottenham, or visited Brixton in London and
have seen for themselves the result of multi-racialism in action -
genocidal ethnic cleansing of Whites. It is obvious that only a
miniscule fraction of East European visitors will want to settle here.
A massive contrast to the intentions of the third-world colonists.

The pictures that go with the news stories about East Europeans are
usually photos of Gypsies or Turks. To understand just how offensive
this racist anti-White smear campaign is to the White people from the
east of Europe lets imagine a foreign, say, Chinese TV station
depicting the British or American people as dark-skinned gang-bangers
and the French and Germans as hook-nosed burqa-wearing
"Allaaah"-worshippers. In other words it is wrong to judge the nation
by its unrepresentative minorities that were imported by the "elite"
against the express wishes of the native populations.

There is no racial basis to separate East Europeans from the other
Whites. The White race, of course, can be subdivided into
North-European and South European and into something in between*. But
it cannot be meaningfully subdivided into East and West Europeans.

So perhaps the implied East-West division is merely geographic? This
assertion also cannot stand up to a closer scrutiny. Just one example
- 'East European' Prague is further west than 'West European' Vienna.
If you look at the map you will see that Austria, Czech republic,
Germany, Hungary, parts of Poland and Slovakia are in the centre of
Europe. During the WWI they were known as Central Powers. Indeed many
people from those countries do not accept that 'East European', a term
of racist abuse in our times, applies to them. Likewise people of the
Baltic States consider themselves North Europeans. Their ancient and
medieval history is closely related to history of Vikings and North
European cultural and commercial sphere.
And lets remember that Europe does not end at the Russian border and
Europe's geographical centre is claimed by Lithuania.

There is no such a thing as East Europeans, they are just Europeans
living in the east of the continent. Before WWI nobody considered the
Whites in the east of Europe to be inferior in any way. There was no
historical, no economic, no cultural and no political basis for that.
White peoples in the east of Europe, however, have a more turbulent
recent history that distinguishers them from the more fortunate West
Europeans and Americans. This distinction was brought solely by the
actions of the so-called Entente-Allies who have caused both World Wars
that devastated East Europe; and then, to top it up, the "Allies" have
sold the East Europe to Stalin and Communist monsters.

And even if that was not enough, the so-called West denied any
meaningful aid to East Europe after the collapse of the communism. The
same "West" that in the meantime poured over a TRILLION dollars of aid
to their beloved "Africa" - a breeding ground of their preferred type
of immigrant. Some of the Western "elite" simply fall over themselves
trying to import more of them in a faux-guilt induced orgy of
self-flagellation. Just look at race-traitors Madonna and Angelina
Jollie. One can only guess at what goes on in their "elitist" minds.
Not a lot one would imagine.
Even a fraction of that "African" aid would have enabled the east of
Europe to reach the overall Euro-American level of development.

The recent history is the only thing that makes East Europeans
different from West Europeans and Americans. This memory of horror
brought about by the betrayal by the liberal filth - the current World
"elite".

That this distinction is being overly emphasized is simply ignoble and
is much more debasing to those who utter sneeringly, "East European",
out of the corner of their mouth, than to the targeted "East" Europeans
themselves.

*http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2-2105519,00.html

Wolf Fenrir is is Deputy Information Minister of the Baltic Government
in Exile and Chairman of the Baltic-Israeli Friendship Forum

God is Great! Victory or Paradise!

Vote BNP! The only pro-White party of Britain.

"String up the Traitors and Restore Democracy!"


http://groups.msn.com/BalticLoyalist/
 

 


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




Copyright © 2004, 2007 expatforums.com


Powered by: vBulletin, ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. - LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO