Not the Karl Orff <> wrote in news:canwine-
:
> Was there an equivalent of ICE?
No.
> What was the speed of normal long-distance trains vs. TEE?
AFAIK 160 km/h max.
TEE was not a technology, but a marketing concept. Fast long distance
trains which run regularly in 1 or 2 hour intervals like commuter trains
do, with modern high comfort rolling stock. This is why I'd comparte them
to Inter/Eurocity, because it's the same idea.
OTOH ICE is a technology, comparable to TGV or Shinkansen.
Nothing comparable existed in Europe at the time. (Shinkansen did, in
Japan)
> IIRC, TEE only reached 100 km/h or so
> which isn't very fast compared to today.
TEE would run as fast as a given track allowed them to. Their maximum
speed was whatever conventional trains in the 1970s could reach. I think
that was 160 km/h then. Of course not on all routes, just as today.
Regards
__________________
The anaesthetist misjudged the width of the bridge.
http://www.wschwanke.de/ usenet_20031215 (AT) wschwanke (DOT) de