On 26/1/04 8:55, in article
mC4Rb.27224$, "J. J. Farrell"
<> wrote:
>> Heaven forfend that I should put words in Jeremy's mouth, but since
>> the question was about the child of a UK-born mother, it is hardly
>> surprising that he didn't mention British overseas citizenship or
>> British overseas territories citizenship, or the statuses of British
>> National (Overseas), British subject and British protected person.
>> They're not relevant to the issue at hand.
>
> Indeed - no criticism was intended. These messages become part of
> a permanent archive that people often search. Someone coming across
> Jeremy's statement, and not fully considering the thread context,
> might be misled. This was an attempt to get a message nearby to
> point out that "British citizens" in a more general sense do not
> necessarily have right of abode.
But if we're going to be pedantic today:
"3Â*Â*Conferral on British overseas territories citizens
Â*
Â* Â*Â*Â*Â*"(1) Any person who, immediately before the commencement of this
section, is a British overseas territories citizen shall, on the
commencement of this section, become a British citizen.
Â*
Â* Â*Â*Â*Â*"(2) Subsection (1) does not apply to a person who is a British
overseas territories citizen by virtue only of a connection with the
Sovereign Base Areas of Akrotiri and Dhekelia."
Except that it seems to me that most of those (Akrotiri and Dhekelia people)
will be British citizens anyway by dint of being born to British military or
civil servants. Or they will likely be (unless they happen to be asylum
seekers or ethnic Turkish Cypriots whom the Cypriot Government rejects for
reason, perhaps, of Turkish mainland connection or non-recognition of TRNC
birth registration documents) Cypriot citizens, and hence Commonwealth
Citizens and, soon, EU citizens.
http://www.hmso.gov.uk/acts/acts2002/20008--a.htm#2Â*