View Single Post
Old 12-11-2003, 06:20 AM   #10 (permalink)
Andrew Miller
 
Posts:
Default Re: Andrew Residency question

No, it absolutely doesn't. Read my answer to the original post in this
thread.

What you are referring to is only a description of the meaning of
"accompanying", nothing else.

Read the parts of IRPA to which section 61 of Regulation refers to.
__________________

../..

Andrew Miller
Immigration Consultant
Vancouver, British Columbia
email:
(delete REMOVE from the above address before sending email)
________________________________


"Manish" <member269@british_expats.com> wrote in message
news:...
    > http://www.canlii.org/ca/regu/sor2-227/sec61.html
    > Accompanying outside Canada
    > (4) For the purposes of subparagraphs 28(2)(a)(ii) and (iv) of the Act
    > and this section, a permanent resident is accompanying outside
    > Canada a Canadian citizen or another permanent resident -- who is
    > their spouse or common-law partner or, in the case of a child, their
    > parent -- on each day that the permanent resident is ordinarily
    > residing with the Canadian citizen or the other permanent resident.
    > --------- If Mr. X who is permanent resident and his wife Y also
    > permanent resident of Canada and both X and Y go out of Canada.
    > Does it mean they fulfill the criteria of residency while both are
    > out of Canada?
    > In simple language the stay of X and Y will be counted as Canada
    > residency or not in the above scenario. Why it will not be counted
    > residency? The above paragraph from the site/link is also confusing
    > for a Layman and everybody is not lawyer to understand it correctly.
    > --
    > Posted via http://britishexpats.com