No, it absolutely doesn't. Read my answer to the original post in this
thread.
What you are referring to is only a description of the meaning of
"accompanying", nothing else.
Read the parts of IRPA to which section 61 of Regulation refers to.
__________________
../..
Andrew Miller
Immigration Consultant
Vancouver, British Columbia
email:
(delete REMOVE from the above address before sending email)
________________________________
"Manish" <member269@british_expats.com> wrote in message
news:...
> http://www.canlii.org/ca/regu/sor2-227/sec61.html
> Accompanying outside Canada
> (4) For the purposes of subparagraphs 28(2)(a)(ii) and (iv) of the Act
> and this section, a permanent resident is accompanying outside
> Canada a Canadian citizen or another permanent resident -- who is
> their spouse or common-law partner or, in the case of a child, their
> parent -- on each day that the permanent resident is ordinarily
> residing with the Canadian citizen or the other permanent resident.
> --------- If Mr. X who is permanent resident and his wife Y also
> permanent resident of Canada and both X and Y go out of Canada.
> Does it mean they fulfill the criteria of residency while both are
> out of Canada?
> In simple language the stay of X and Y will be counted as Canada
> residency or not in the above scenario. Why it will not be counted
> residency? The above paragraph from the site/link is also confusing
> for a Layman and everybody is not lawyer to understand it correctly.
> --
> Posted via http://britishexpats.com