"~Kamie~" wrote:
> My husband's mother is an American citizen by birth - though
> after marrying a Canadian she lived and has lived in Canada
> since - they married at the age of 21 and lived in the States
> together for about 4 years before moving to Canada. My hus-
> band's father is a Canadian citizen by birth. They were
> married in the US in 1971. My husband was born in Canada
> and lived there for 19 years, before marrying me (American
> citizen by birth) and applying for his green card in the US.
> Does he have any claim to US citizenship or would he have -
> through his mother being a citizen?
It definitely sounds to me like your husband is automatically a US
citizen by birth, through his mother. This would be the case even
if your mother-in-law had not realized he had US citizenship and
had never registered his birth with US consular officials in Canada.
Note that your husband's US citizenship (assuming he does in fact
have it) would not conflict in any way with his also having Canadian
citizenship. He would have acquired both citizenships at birth, and
contrary to widely held misconceptions, he would never have had any
obligation to pick one citizenship and give up the other -- he can
keep both citizenships for life.
The only event I can think of which might prevent your husband from
having US citizenship would be if his mother became a Canadian citizen
before he was born. Until well into the 1980's, the acquisition of
non-US citizenship as an adult typically led to loss of one's US
citizenship if US officials found out about it -- and if your mother-
in-law lost her US citizenship before your husband was born, he would
not have had any claim to US citizenship through her. (Please note
that foreign naturalization doesn't cause loss of US citizenship any
longer -- but it used to.) Note that merely marrying a Canadian
would =not= have been enough to give your mother-in-law Canadian
citizenship or cause her to lose US citizenship -- she would have
had to file a specific application for Canadian naturalization.)
"jgbreton" wrote:
> December 24, 1952 to November 13, 1986 . . . . If only one
> parent was a U.S. citizen at the time of your birth, that
> parent must have resided in the United States for at least
> ten years, at least five of which had to be after the age
> of 16.
Not quite. That was the rule prior to 24 Dec. 1952.
Between 1952 and 1986, the requirement (for a child born abroad to
one American parent to have US citizenship at birth) was that the
American parent must have been LITERALLY, PHYSICALLY PRESENT in
the US (or US territories or possessions) for at least ten years.
Physical presence is not necessarily the same as "residence"; time
spent travelling abroad while one's home was in the US, for instance,
did NOT qualify toward the required ten years of physical presence.
Also, at least five years of physical presence in the US had to have
occurred after the American parent's 14th (not 16th) birthday.
On 14 Nov. 1986, Congress changed the law to say that a child born
outside the US to one American parent would acquire US citizenship
at birth if the American parent had spent at least five (not ten)
years of physical presence in the US -- including at least two (not
five) years after the parent's 14th birthday. But note that this
new version of the law does NOT apply retroactively to people born
prior to 14 Nov. 1986. What this means is that a person's exact
birthdate can be crucial in determining which set of rules control
his/her entitlement to US citizenship at birth.
Rich Wales
http://www.richw.org/dualcit/
*DISCLAIMER: I am not a lawyer, professional immigration consultant,
or consular officer. My comments are for discussion purposes only and
are not intended to be relied upon as legal or professional advice.